July 31st, 2010

Wikileaks and the importance of reputation

abigail

A couple of weeks ago, I attended the ONA’s meet up which discussed the growing links between journalists and hackers in order to uncover stories said to be in the public interest. Earlier this week, Wikileaks – a site infamous for publishing anonymous information – published over 90,000 documents about the war in Afghanistan much to the horror of the international collation currently engaged in the ongoing war.

This got me thinking about the term ‘public interest’. There is something idealised about the term don’t you think? With it comes a perception that we are all equiped with the intelligence, understanding and analytical skills to process information brought to us by championing anonymous angels of democracy.

However, I tend to think that the majority are not in this position or care to spend time picking over the facts. Context is vital in the mix, and when leaked information is dumped on a public – often analysed and spun by a media hungry for page views – context can so often get lost.

This brings me back to the ONA talk, which I attended as the only PR in the room. In my previous post, I mentioned that I had a distinct feeling of discomfort. Call me sensitive, but I picked up a feeling that the journalists attending didn’t appreciate the control that PRs have of messages. This control, possibly control of public interest, I would argue as being necessary.

Sometimes it is just not in the public interest to know. That is why we pay our politicians and civil servants a huge amount of money to make the difficult decisions for us. We are lucky to able to sleep the sleep of the just, get up in the morning to review and judge these decisions via our favourite dailies (The Guardian, Daily Mail or drive time radio) over our breakfast toast, whilst catching up on the latest predictions of Paul the Psychic Octopus

Since the start of the year the current collation death toll in Afghanistan stands at 1,822 and the death toll of Afghanistan people since 2001 mounts into the tens of thousands. It is in the public interest that some sort of peace and stability is brought to this country, but I’m not sure that leaking sensitive information, possibly putting more lives in danger, is the way to go about it.

July 28th, 2010

The perils of social media as a pr tool

Rebecca

Oh dear, another brand trips over the step on the way into Facebook. The latest edition of PR Week reprises the tale of Dr Pepper’s attempt at being down with the kids, except that CocaCola had to pull the page when it sailed to close to the wind in its bid for online PR kudos.  Here at thebluedoor PR agency we’re often asked to advise upon social media strategy, and frequently deliver as PR consultants on social media summits and training, as well as of course including this whole arena in our PR campaigns.  Never has it seemed so crucial that social media should be handled with care.

Nevertheless, in many ways, it’s all just too tempting for some to dive in quickly and without forethought. Twitter and the like are a dream PR medium in many respects – used appropriately and with knowledge of how they work, social networking sites become another bullet with which to hit your target. But it’s no revelation that with the rise and rise of social networking sites, the pitfalls get ever deeper, and the trip wires omnipresent in the world of brand building online.

It is a naïve brand that underestimates social media tools and their inhabitants, and worse, that enters the world of Twitter et al without understanding how they work.  It’s a dangerous place for the uninitiated who have a brand to promote and protect – take note, Dr Pepper, and Gillian McKeith, KitKat, Rentokil, the list goes on. There are numerous examples of brands who fail to understand that storms can be made on Twitter or Facebook, and indeed that it is the remit of many inhabitants of social networks to whip up such frenzies and ‘out’ the disingenuous, failing or unethical. It is the ultimate free press.

So, social media has to be taken more seriously as a PR medium, most importantly by those doing, unwittingly or otherwise, their own PR.  A good PR pro would never openly comment on Twitter without absolute confidence, knowledge, client say-so or any of the usual background preparation any more than they would to a print journalist, but so many people do exactly that because of the accessibility of Twitter.  You wouldn’t navigate the Grand Canyon without a guide – get someone on board who knows the terrain, and if you can’t do that, as with other PR-gone-bad scenarios, the best advice is to face your critics with honesty and openness, followed by a holiday.

July 22nd, 2010

The phenomenon of Facebook continues

grace

In the past few years social networking sites have become integral to many PR strategies despite the interesting dilemmas. Perfectly demonstrating this is Facebook as it reaches an amazing 500 million users this week.

The rate of growth that Facebook has achieved has been truly phenomenal. What is interesting however, is how its users are evidently irritated by many aspects of the service. As a recent US customer service survey carried by ForSeeResults (c/o Techcrunch) stated, many of its users actually don’t like it very much at all. Popular pet hates about the site include the ubiquitous privacy issue along with advertising, functionality issues and constant changes to name but a few!

This comes as no real surprise however as the privacy issue for one has been rearing its head for some time and has in the past proved itself to be a real cause for concern. With your online presence and offline life increasingly overlapping it’s hard to imagine this problem resolving anytime soon.

With a free service such as Facebook, it’s not always going to be possible to please each individual’s personal preference every time. However for a site that’s caused such controversy this makes the growth appear all the more impressive:

Figures c/o The Independent:

January 2009 it had150 million users
Five months ago, facebook had 400 million users
Reaching 500 million users amounts to an astounding 8% of the world’s population
All this just six years after its creation!

This raises a number of interesting questions about online PR as well as the motivations of social networking site users in particular.

Love it or hate it, the numbers speak for themselves so here’s offering a big congratulations to Facebook!

July 15th, 2010

Hacks and Hacking: working to uncover the new journalism #onauk

abigail

The Online News Association has over 1,600 members world-wide, and is set up for journalists producing news for digital channels. As part of their activities, regular meet-ups are organised for members and interested parties, often with a speaker / panel focusing on a current or important topic.

The UK’s chair, Kathryn Corrick, kindly invited me to attend this week’s meet up, hosted by Katie King of Microsoft. The subject was ‘Hacks and Hacking’, exploring the interchange between these two parties in their combined quest of analysing data to understand patterns and trends in the process of news gathering.

On the panel were (summaries taken from the ONA events page):

Dr. Rufus Pollock – Mead Fellow in Economics at Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge and a Director of the Open Knowledge Foundation which he co-founded in 2004.

Becky Hogge – journalist and writer on information politics, human rights and technology. Becky is former managing editor of OpenDemocracy during which time she helped establish the China environment website chinadialogue.net.

Dr Chris Thorpe (@jaggeree) – Has been tasked with creating the Guardian’s developer outreach program, including the development of its Open Platform.

Their insights and the resulting conversations were fascinating. Here were some of my frantic scribblings – I have tried to accurately record who said what, however as a newbie to the group, I did not catch everyone’s name….

“The Internet is bi-directional allowing consumption and creation… it is a cheap mechansim allowing an individual to publish to many.” Dr Chris Thorpe (CT)

“The web allows users, readers, subscribers – what ever you want to call them – interested individuals, to pull down the walls between themselves, journalists and readers.” (CT)

“Go and read ‘The Story of Newspapers” – a Ladybird book published in 1969 which discusses whether TV will kill newspapers. The same conversations are happening now with the Internet.” (CT)

“Restricting the access to content results in a reduction of the influence of the content. The walls will result in the ‘content’ continuing to talk to the same gene pool of those readers.” (CT)

“Magazines are finish-able. The Internet it not. Publications such as magazines are the curational bundling of content which enable the serendipitous discovery of stories.” (CT)

“You can’t solve social problems with software.” (Unknown)

“What’s hot or not; What’s correct or not – this is at the heart of journalism and has been at the heart of the discipline forever.” (Professor George Brock)

As the one PR in the room, bearing witness to this conversation with some immensely respected practitioners of the profession was an immense privilege.  At times it was uncomfortable listening, particularly when frustration was vented about being spun a story by the government (e.g.: the PRs). It was also hugely important to hear how data, numbers, trends, FOI’s are playing an increased part in news gathering and investigation.

The next ONA speaker focused event is planned for 14th September, looking at bloggers in the dock – another fascinating and vital area to keep in touch with and understand. Count me in Kathryn!

June 28th, 2010

Public Relations Pays in Recession

Rebecca

The media analysis in the aftermath of an emergency budget was never going to make for light reading, but I stumbled across Robert Shrimsley’s Notebook today in the Financial Times, a spoof that likened the moments after Osborne’s axe falling to the recovery room and a post-op visit from the doctor.

It makes for an inward chuckle, not least the part where ‘Dr’ Osborne, when asked how the op went by the patient, replies ‘Well, I’m not going to bury the painful details in the small print. This was an unavoidable operation’, to which the patient replies ‘Yes but what did you do?’ ‘We amputated your legs. Perhaps if your last doctor had acted sooner…’ You get the idea.

It’s hard to see the sunny side when times are hard, except that it’s sweltering here at thebluedoor so it’s not that tricky.. Anyway, we’re a positive bunch. Even when the economy has lost its legs, we believe there’s a place for PR, marketing and generally pushing your brand.  I know we would say that, but so do others:

“Statistics show that businesses who consistently spent money on marketing during every major recession in the last century dramatically increased their market share and retained a dominant position at the end of that time” Source: Scott Dawson Advertising.

It’s proving a rewarding time, with companies innovating and being open to creative ideas in spite of everything.  As one inimitable brand, Bob Hoskins, once said – You know it makes sense.

June 14th, 2010

The value of journalism (#voj10): a review

grace

On Friday 11th June I had the pleasure of attending The Value of Journalism conference.

Organised by the BBC College of Journalism (c/o @thoroughlygood) and Polis at the London School of Economics, the day was packed full of panel discussions and talks about the development of networked journalism and what this means for the industry. Among others, speakers included Jon Snow (Channel Four), Janine Gibson (The Guardian), Danny Finkelstein (The Times) and Peter Horrocks (BBC).

Here’s just a quick run-down of what some of the discussions covered:

Jon Snow began proceedings by delivering an interesting keynote speech explaining how he believes how we are entering a ‘golden age’ in journalism. Drawing on experience reporting from Haiti and the 2010 general election, he argued the case that traditional journalism is still very much essential to the production and distribution of news. Using a colourful metaphor, he compared the documentary, Man on Wire, to the current situation that journalism is facing. On one tower, we have traditional journalism and long standing institutions, and on the other is new media – the Googles and Apples of the world. As neither can replace the other, the challenge of them working together needs to be overcome in order for value to be shared between the two.

Janine Gibson from The Guardian and Danny Finkelstein from The Times went head to head in a panel discussion about newspapers and networked journalism. Discussions about the forthcoming experiment with The Times and The Sunday Times paywall raised many questions including ones about what subscribers to The Times will be paying for, content or the utility? How interactive the site will be for users? And many more.  The Guardian stated that there are payment issues for both online and print, and charging for online content isn’t necessarily going to solve the financial problems that many publications are currently facing.

Director of World News at the BBC, Peter Horrocks gave the final keynote speech of the day entitled, ‘From Fortress to Network’. In this, he explained about the importance of different networks and how it is essential for journalists to engage with their audience. Using the BBC as a case study, Horrocks stated how strong institutions, (the fortress) provide security and comfort but that in current times those within the institution need to get used to sharing. In a world that is getting smaller due to social media, audience consumption has been undoubtedly changed – this in turn demands for a change in the approach to traditional journalism.

Other discussions included ‘The value of free newspapers’ in a talk from Geordie Greig (The Evening Standard), and panel discussions: ‘Networked politics and political reporting’ and ‘International networked journalism’.

All the speakers delivered fantastically informed, insightful speeches and opinions.

The result was a day full of lively, thought-provoking debates about how public involvement in journalism and the use of Web 2.0 has influenced and ultimately changed the industry in the midst of a global recession.

To find out more information on the Value of Journalism and to watch some of the discussions and keynote speeches that took place, please visit: http://www.bbc.co.uk/journalism/valueofjournalism/ or search Twitter for #voj10.

May 27th, 2010

Surrey’s digital future

abigail

Digital Surrey is a new initiative launched and curated by thebluedoor.  It is a community for like-minded people wanting to stay up-to-date with the ever changing digital landscape, and: meet-up, network, learn, share.

Due to our interest, both as a Surrey PR agency and as founders of Digital Surrey, yesterday evening I attended the Surrey Economic Partnership’s event to help define a new business plan for the region. It was hugely well attended with over 150 people in the room.

I was interested to hear that the issue of the county’s infrastructure came up time and time again, and intrinsically linked to this is our current broadband / mobile / digital provision.

In order to continue to be the country’s economic powerhouse, competing at world-class levels, businesses require world-class infrastructure if we are to have a hope. Digital Britain’s vision of providing everyone with broadband speeds of 2Mbps is under-whelming (Japan’s was 93Mbps in 1997, and 44Mbps in France).

There were additional facts / figures that were shared at the meeting, including:

  • 30% of the county population is employed in London
  • The county’s population is 1.1m i.e. 13% of the entire South East population
  • 250 global companies are based in Surrey
  • GDA is £26.5bn
  • 55,000 VAT registered businesses in Surrey
  • 40% of the population is degree educated (27% is the UK average)
  • £400k is the average house price

Surrey puts back £5bn back into the national exchequer every year for use elsewhere.

Food for thought. And if you would like to join Digital Surrey, come and find the group on LinkedIn.  Our next free meet up is on 24th June. The speaker, Andy Piper from IBM, will be giving a talk entitled ‘Stepping out of the online echo chamber: how companies can be more social in business and why they should’.

May 14th, 2010

Public Relations tips for success

jenifer

Well, what a busy few weeks it’s been, filled with all kinds of excitement from ash clouds to general election nail biting. Having emerged with a brand new government mid-week, we felt it was time to start putting some of our own new policies and ideas into action.

And that is why those of you surfing our website may notice that we have added a new section “PR tips.”

This new page contains handy downloadable PDF’s on a wide variety of subjects such as “media training” and “how to brief a PR agency.”  These public relations guides are designed to provide helpful tips and hints for those new to public relations or those looking to learn more about a career in PR.

We hope that these tips and hints will be valuable resources and that they will help give those new to public relations a real idea of what can be achieved through careful media communications.

If you don’t see what you need on our PR tips page, please get in touch with us at thebluedoor and we will try to provide you with the information you are looking for!

May 7th, 2010

PR vs. SEO: the Social Media in a Corporate Context 2010 debate

abigail

So where should social media sit within the organisation? SEO? PR? Its own department? Following a debate I had with Andrew Girdwood of Bigmouthmedia last year in Communicate Magazine, we were both invited to take part in a live Mace format debate at the magazine’s conference at the end of April.

The second proposition came from Chris Reed of Brew, and supporting Andrew Girdwood in his opposition was Jemima Garthwaite of MyCityDeal.co.uk.

Granted the audience was heavily populated by PR people, however the vote was almost unanimous in its support that PR should lead social media activities in external communications.

Here is my contribution in the form of the First Proposition.

General Introduction

Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Abigail Harrison and I am the Managing Director of thebluedoor, a specialist Public Relations agency with experience in traditional and digital PR.

Thanks to the generous invitation of Communicate Magazine I am here today to argue that Public Relations agencies or departments should manage corporate social media strategies, as opposed to Search Engine Optimisation consultancies.

While SEO is crucial to raising brand awareness in the online era, I believe it is only one component of an integrated PR strategy.  Let me elaborate my argument by making four basic points.

Point #1: Any Definition of Public Relations involves Social Media, either Implicitly or Explicitly

As defined by the fifth edition of the Handbook of Public Relations, PR is “the art and social science of analysing trends, predicting their consequences, counselling organisations’ leaders and implementing planned programmes of action which will serve both the organisation and the public interest.” Social media is part and parcel of these activities, particularly in a world defined by Web 2.0 technologies, heightened consumer awareness, and sophisticated public demand. And with the social areas of the web continuing to grow at a breakneck pace, PR practitioners have naturally adapted. Their expertise has become increasingly crucial to ensuring that clients avoid PR disasters with potentially web-wide repercussions.

Point #2: PR Offers Overarching Business Strategies while SEO Is a Helpful Tool

A good number of corporate executives have tried to apply the concepts developed by the Prussian general Carl von Clausewitz to their business strategies. Needless to say, war is not entirely synonymous with business, but they both require strategic vision if success is to be achieved.

As Clauswitz famously said in his text, On War, “War has its own grammar, but not its own logic.” If we apply this insight to today’s business world, it suggests that while tools such as SEO are important, they only constitute the “grammar” of business. What business needs now, and what it will always need is a “language” – i.e., an overarching design or framework that actually communicates the vision business leaders hope to achieve.

PR agencies provide this social media “language.” They stitch together the tools of success, the “words,” if you will, into an over-arching, people-centric design which facilitates business development. Yes, SEO consultancies are undeniably important. They provide the tools, the techniques and the algorithms that help generate public interest, but to use tools, such as SEO, outside of the broader PR framework would be like substituting mere grammar for language. In a world in which Google cites “brand reputation” as the most important factor in determining search results, such a tactical, non-strategic approach would represent far too great a risk for any company’s reputation.

The modern world is full of inevitable frictions, chance events, imperfections in execution and the independent will of competitors.  These inevitabilities make the human factors of business of paramount importance today. They also demand the leadership and instinctive savvy of PR professionals who can promote central ideas through constantly changing circumstances. PR professionals accomplish this goal by considering a brand’s essence, its audience and its voice before considering the channels and tools, such as SEO, which help to manage corporate reputations in an age where “going viral” is always a possibility.

Point #3: Increased Consumer Engagement Equals an Increased Need for PR

Public Relations is more vital than ever before, given the explosion of consumer engagement through new and social media, the collapse of reputation and trust in major institutions, and the evolving needs and concerns of corporate CEOs.

PR professionals provide broad frameworks for reputation management and customer engagement. We first develop social media roadmaps based on our analyses of target audiences and the client’s core objectives. We then develop communications strategies of which blogs, videos, Twitter and social networking tools are all a part. Third, we optimise search engines and seek to achieve our ultimate goals of listening to consumers, facilitating communications, and managing brand reputation. And finally, we do all this through multiple communications channels and forms of content, taking care to address current problems of information overload and short attention spans. These activities are the essence of social media, not merely a tool.

Point #4: PR Secures Brand Reputation

Google has worked to increase the importance of brand reputation for a number of years. Moves such as banning paid linking and giving webmasters the ability to not pass “worth” from comment spam with the “No Follow” tag are just some examples.

In June 2009, Google’s brand update focused on brand reputation in a very public way. The update focused on a business’s reputation, using Page Rank measurements as indicators of how much authority a business command, and thereby considering the very things that PR professionals see as the nuts and bolts of our jobs. This means looking at a brand’s “authority” factor in detail by counting mentions in mainstream media, links from mainstream media, brand mentions and “buzz” as the priorities for those likely to rank highly in searches. Given this new and growing context, the “language” provided by PR professionals is more important than ever.

Conclusion

As PR professionals, we have a passion for crafting creative concepts, writing credible content, ensuring robust messaging, protecting reputations and producing successful results. Traditional PR has always placed emphasis on gaining strong mainstream media mentions; forging strategic links, ties and partnerships; and of course, creating “buzz”.

It’s therefore gratifying to know that these are now being recognised as key indicators of corporate reputation by companies such as Google. As an industry, we should enjoy this recognition and ensure that we not only use all opportunities available to us, but are also able to help steer these technologies effectively in the future. In the eyes of Clausewitz, we will thereby ensure that our clients’ business strategies have their own ‘language’, and are not lost in their own ‘grammar’.

April 13th, 2010

A PRs Guide to the Social Landscape

karen

In my constant search to discover all things digital and PR, I stumbled across CMO.com’s guide to: The Social Landscape. It’s a fantastic summary which ranks the most used social media sites according to your communication objectives. While it’s not a guaranteed solution to identifying the best social media site for your brand, it’s a handy ‘crib sheet’ to jump start your thinking.

The guide provides an analysis of key sites including Twitter, Facebook and YouTube and rates them according to the impact using these tools could have on your overall communications strategy.

The guide ranks each site as ‘good’, ‘bad’ or ‘ok’ dependent on how each one performs on:

  • Customer communication
  • Brand exposure
  • Traffic to your site
  • SEO

Download a pdf of the SMO’s Guide to the Social landscape by following the link.